(1.) This revision is directed against the order of the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (in short, "the State Commission") dated 22.8.2016 in first appeal No.1905/2016.
(2.) Facts giving rise to this revision petition are that the respondent filed a consumer complaint in respect of alleged deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party in relation to a franchisee agreement entered into between the parties. The opposite party was ex-parte before the District Forum. The District Forum vide its order dated 14.7.2016 took the view that since the services of the opposite parties were hired/availed for commercial purpose, the complainant was not a consumer. The complaint was, therefore, dismissed on the aforesaid technical ground.
(3.) Being aggrieved of the dismissal of the complaint, the respondent/complainant approached the State Commission, Karnataka in appeal. The State Commission without opting to issue notice of the appeal to the petitioner/opposite party allowed the appeal and remanded the matter back to the District Forum concerned with a direction to consider the case on merits after issue of notice to the opposite parties.