(1.) The learned proxy counsel for the petitioner seeks adjournment but considering the age of the petitions which came to be filed more than seven years ago, I am not inclined to adjourn the matter and therefore, proceed to decide the revision petitions on merits.
(2.) In revision petition no. 524/2008, the complainant/respondent booked a flat bearing no. 102 on the first floor in B-Wing, measuring 600 sq. feet at Tika No. 7, CTS No. 36(1), 36(2) & 36(3), 2nd Rabodi, Thane (West), paying consideration of Rs. 10,52,000/- to the petitioner/opposite party namely Akhtar Ahmad. The opposite party/respondent however, did not deliver possession of the aforesaid flat to the complainant. Being aggrieved, he preferred a complaint before the concerned District Forum at Thane.
(3.) In revision petition no. 525/2008, the complainant booked flat no. 202 in the same complex paying a consideration of Rs.7,20,000/-. The respondent/opposite party failed to deliver possession of that flat as well to the complainant. Being aggrieved, he filed a separate complaint before the concerned District Forum.