LAWS(NCD)-1994-9-85

MANAGER SKYPAK AGENCY Vs. K K KARUNAKARAN PILLAI

Decided On September 09, 1994
MANAGER SKYPAK AGENCY Appellant
V/S
K K KARUNAKARAN PILLAI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the order passed by the District Forum, Pathanamthitta in O. P.154/91. The opposite parties are the appellants.

(2.) On 7.2.1991 complainant entrusted with the Thiruvalla office of M/s. Skypak a cover addressed to one Mr. V. C. Thomas, Hindustan Motors Ltd. Motor P. O. Hoogly (District) West Bengal. It is alleged that the cover contained a demand draft for Rs.1,90,000/- favouring Messrs. Dewara Garage and a letter to the addressee asking him to hand over the draft to the payee and to arrange purchase of a new Ambassador Car. It is the case of the complainant that the 1st opposite party agreed to hand over the cover to the addressee at Hoogly on 8.2.1991. But the cover did not reach the addressee as agreed. Complainant contacted the Thiruvella and Kottayam Offices of M/s. Skypak when he received communications regarding the non-receipt of the cover entrusted with the opposite party for delivery. At last the cover reached the addressee on 7.3.1991. It is in those circumstances the complainant claims compensation.

(3.) The opposite parties filed their versions admitting the receipt of the packet addressed to Mr. V. C. Thomas. The delayed delivery of the article is also not denied. However, it was contended that the delivery areas for domestic consignments have been divided into two zones at the destination, viz. normal delivery area (city limit) and diplomatic area and that for the delivery in diplomatic area the company used to collect extra service charge depending upon the distance. Calcutta is a normal delivery area whereas Hoogly which is 100 K. M. away from the office of the company in Calcutta is a diplomatic area. The destination point being a diplomatic area the company is entitlted to realise Rs.250 as diplomatic charges. It was also contended that the complainant did not pay them the diplomatic charges of Rs.250/- and when the complainant was told about the additional charges at the time of entrustment he agreed to pay the amount within a few hours. Calcutta Office withheld the consignment under intimation to the opposite party since the diplomatic charges were not paid by the complainant. Finally at the risk of Kottayam Manager the delivery was effected.