LAWS(NCD)-2024-9-9

DREAM DWELLINGS Vs. RAMA SAHA

Decided On September 19, 2024
Dream Dwellings Appellant
V/S
Rama Saha Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal under Sec. 19 the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the 'Act') is directed against the order dtd. 15/3/2018 of the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata in Complaint no. 419 of 2014 allowing the complaint and directing the appellants to jointly and severally pay the respondent Rs.13,87,645.00 with interest @ 8% p.a. from 15/6/2008 till realization and to handover possession letter, authenticated copy of the sanctioned plan and Completion Certificate of the subject premises within 30 days along with litigation expenses of Rs.10,000.00 within 30 days failing which with interest @ 8% p.a. till date of payment.

(2.) We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. IA 10852 of 2023 dtd. 29/8/2023 seeking to bring on record the legal heirs of the respondent, Smt Rama Devi, who had since expired, was allowed on 13/9/2023 and the amended Memo of Parties taken on record.

(3.) The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the late respondent was the owner of premises at 133, New Santoshpur, PS Purba Jadavpur, Kolkata 700075 (District South 24 Parganas) within the local limits of Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC). On 5/7/2006 a Development Agreement was entered into by her with the appellants regarding construction of a ground plus 3 storied residential building comprising 8 flats with car parking spaces to be executed by the appellant who is a builder. Flat No. F3 admeasuring 710.90 sq ft along with one car parking space was allotted to the respondent. The respondent was entitled to 40% of the sanctioned area or 2436.60 sq ft inclusive of Flat F3 and the balance of 1742.70 sq ft to be monetized at the average sale price of the other flats and to be provided the Completion and Occupancy Certificates from KMC. In the event of failure to do so, the respondent was entitled to Rs.10,000.00 per month. The respondent executed a General Power of Attorney (GPA) in favour of the appellants to enter into an Agreement for Sale in respect of 1742 sq ft and to deposit the sale proceeds in her bank account. Construction was to be completed within 18 months from the date of the sanctioned plan which was obtained on 16/12/2006, i.e. by 15/6/2008. According to the respondent the project was delayed by the appellants and therefore a consumer complaint was filed before the State Commission on 27/11/2008 alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. This complaint came to be decided on contest in favour of the respondent as per the impugned order which is the subject of this first appeal filed by the appellants.