(1.) The unsuccessful opposite party No.2 against whom the complaint was allowed is the appellant before this Commission.1. The facts in brief are that on 28.8.1992 the complainant purchased a Bajaj Chetak Scooter from the first opposite party, who is a dealer in Bajaj Auto Vehicles, for Rs.17,895/- under Invoice No.3851 dated 28.8.1992 (Ex. A-7) under a finance scheme titled as "olympic Scheme" offered by the second opposite party.
(2.) An application of Hire Purchase Finance, Ex. B-1, was submitted by the complainant on 26.8.1992 to the second opposite party for finance of Rs.19,500/- to purchase the said vehicle. The amount is to be repaid in 36 monthly instalments. The second opposite party agreed to finance the said amount with interest @ 10.75% p. a. for a period of three years, worked out the entire amount payable by the complainant at Rs.25,812/- which is to be paid in 36 monthly instalments of Rs.717/- per month. The second opposite party also obtained an agreement Ex. B-2 and a promissory note from the complainant on the same day.
(3.) However, the second opposite party, collected, at the vez out-set, a sum of Rs.405/- towards margin money, Rs.3,800/- in advance, towards last few instalments viz. , Rs.215/- towards part of 31st instalment, Rs.3,585/- towards 32nd to 36th instalments and Rs.550/- towards documentation charges, in all Rs.4,350/- by means of a demand draft dated 27.8.1992 from the complainant.