BAIDYANATH PRASAD SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant intra-court appeal is against the order dated 17.01.2018 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No.6019 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge has declined to regularize the service of the appellant/writ-petitioner for the period from 23.05.2001 to 24.01.2006.

(2.) Before entering into the legality and propriety of the impugned order, it requires to refer herein certain factual aspects which led the appellant/writ-petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court as conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which are as follows:

(3.) Learned counsel for the appellant/writ-petitioner has submitted that the learned Single Judge has committed error in not interfering with the impugned decision taken by the authority vide order dated 08.05.2013 mainly on the ground that the reason for absence was beyond his control since he was suffering from cardiac problem and to that effect, medical certificates have been produced but the same have not been taken into consideration either by the authority while considering the claim of the appellant/writ-petitioner or by the learned Single Judge.