ASHISH TOPPO Vs. SAMU KACHHAP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. J.J. Sanga, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Venkateshwar Gopal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. None appears on behalf of the other respondents in spite of valid service of notice.

(2.) In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 14.06.2013 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Munsif, Ranchi in Title Suit No. 48/2002, whereby and whereunder the intervention application preferred on behalf of the petitioner has been rejected.

(3.) A Title Suit has been preferred by the plaintiff/respondent Nos. 2 and 3 being Title Suit No. 48/2002 in which the following prayer was made: