RAJESH CHOUHAN Vs. SUMAN DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has filed I.A. No.7645 of 2017, in which he has stated as under:

(2.) The petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 13.08.2015 passed in Maintenance Petition No.187 of 2012, by which he has been directed to pay Rs.4,000/- per month to his wife and Rs.1,000/- to his minor son till he attains majority.

(3.) Mr. Pratiush Lala, the learned counsel appears for the opposite-party and states that as per the instructions from the opposite-party she has not re-married. He submits that since the only ground on which the judgment in Maintenance Petition No.187 of 2012 has now been sought to be challenged is re-marriage of the opposite-party, the petitioner has appropriate remedy elsewhere and not in filing this criminal revision petition.2