LAWS(JHAR)-2019-11-58

NARYAN MAHATO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On November 19, 2019
Naryan Mahato Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder following prayers have been made :-

(2.) After vesting of Jamindari, the grandfather of the petitioner has mutated the land in his favour in sarista of the Government and Zamabandi No. 988 has been created and started making payment of rent.

(3.) In the year 2006 i.e. at the time of preparation of revisional survey, the Khatiyan has been prepared by making entry of wrong person, therefore, the petitioner has filed a suit under Section 87 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 being Suit No. 428 of 2006 and 511 of 2006 before the Settlement Officer, Dhanbad, who, after hearing the parties, had passed order on 01.11.2008 and 22.06.2009 in favour of the petitioner by recording the name of the petitioner in column of raiyat in the record of rights.