(1.) The petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 08.04.2015 passed in Maintenance Case No.22 of 2013 by which he has been directed to pay Rs.2,500/- to the applicant from the date of filing of the case.
(2.) Mr. Gaurav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that after a compromise was affected between the parties, a Panchat prepared and the criminal case instituted by O.P No.2 vide P.C.R Case No.186 of 2007 was dismissed, the applicant has filed a petition under section 125 Cr.P.C which is not maintainable in view of sub-section 4 of section 125 Cr.P.C.
(3.) In a proceeding under section 125 Cr.P.C, the applicant, O.P No.2 herein, has produced 4 witnesses, however, inspite of five adjournments the petitioner did not lead any evidence in support of the stand taken by him.