REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAJ KUMAR MAHTO Appellant

V/S

STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. SURENDER SINGH AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
INDRA SAWHNEY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
VALSAMMA PAUL MRS KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VS. COCHIN UNIVERSITY:DR KANJAMMA ALEX [REFERRED TO]
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH VS. U P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. S VINODH KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
BEDANGA TALUKDAR VS. SAIFUDAULLAH KHAN [REFERRED TO]
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD VS. RAM KUMAR GIJROYA [REFERRED TO]
MADRAS INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES AND ANOTHER; S ANANDHI AND OTHERS VS. K SIVASUBRAMANIYAN AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RAM KUMAR GIJROYA VS. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. [REFERRED TO]
ANIL TANTI IN W.P. (S) NO. 1630 OF 17 VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. (IN ALL CASES) [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH BAKSHI & ANR VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VS. SANDEEP SHRIRAM WARADE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The issues involved in all the writ petitions are same, similar or identical and as such all have been tagged and heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

(2.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(3.) The core issue involved in all these writ petitions is as to whether benefits of reservations under SC, ST, BC-I and BC-II categories can be given to concerned petitioners even when they failed to produce valid Caste Certificates at the time of verification of certificates in proforma as mentioned in the advertisements or issued prior to last date of submission of on-line application forms by the competent authorities in terms of the respective Advertisements.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAJ KUMAR MAHTO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address