(1.) This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by original respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 of the writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No. 1736 of 2010. The writ petition was preferred by the present respondent nos. 2 and 3. The writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 10th September, 2014 and hence, original respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.
(2.) Factual Matrix:
(3.) Arguments canvassed by the counsel for the appellants (original respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 in W.P.(C) No. 1736 of 2010):