REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SUSHILA DEVI Appellant

V/S

Dinesh Prasad Gupta Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KALWA DEVDATTAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
PANDURANG VITHOBA VS. PANDURANG RAMCHANDRAL [REFERRED TO]
SUSHILA DEVI RAMPURIA VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
SM. CHAMPA KUMARI SINGHI VS. ADDITIONAL MEMBER,BOARD OF REVENUE,WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
S. K. DEVI VS. J. P. SINGH [REFERRED TO]
BIJOY KANT DEY VS. RADHA KANT [REFERRED TO]
MAGUNI PADHANO VS. LOKANANIDHI LINGARAJ DORA [REFERRED TO]
VIDE AMRITALAL VS. SURATHLAL [REFERRED TO]
KOPPULA KOTESHWARA RAO VS. KOPPULA HEMANT RAO [REFERRED TO]
MALLAPPA GIRIMALLAPPA BETGERI VS. R YELLAPPAGOUDA PATIL [REFERRED TO]
RUKHMABAI VS. LALA LAXMINARAYAN [REFERRED TO]
K V NARAYANASWAMI IYER VS. K V RAMAKRISHNA IYER [REFERRED TO]
COMMR OF INCOME TAX MADHYA PRADESH NAGPUR AND BHANDARA NAGPUR IN BOTH THE APPEALS VS. SETH GOVINDRAM SUGAR MILLS IN BOTH THE APPEALS [REFERRED TO]
JAYDAYAL PODDAR VS. BIBI HAZRA [REFERRED TO]
JAYDAYAL PODDAR VS. BIBI HAZRA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. MOKSH BUILDERS AND FINANCIERS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
THAKUR BHIM SINGH THAKUR KAN SINGH VS. THAKUR KAN SINGH:THAKUR BHIM SINGH [REFERRED TO]
K BALAKRISHNAN VS. K KAMALAM [REFERRED TO]
BINAPANI PAUL VS. PRATIMA GHOSH [REFERRED TO]
CORPORATION OF CITY OF BANGALORE VS. ZULEKHA BI [REFERRED TO]
BACHHAJ NAHAR VS. NILIMA MANDAL [REFERRED TO]
HAR PRASAD VS. MST RAM DEVI [REFERRED TO]
MANOHARI DEVI VS. CHOUDHURY SIBANAVA DAS [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. SETH LAXMI NARAYAN RAGHUNATHDAS [REFERRED TO]
JANKI SAO VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [REFERRED TO]
CHANDAR SAH VS. UNION OF INDIAGODHANI [REFERRED TO]
RAM LAKHAN VS. PANDIT RAGHUNANDAN [REFERRED TO]
RUKAIYA BEGUM VS. FAZALUR REHMAN [REFERRED TO]
APPALASWAMI VS. SURYANARAYANAMURTI [REFERRED TO]
SHADI LAL VS. LAL BAHADUR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF J&K VS. HINDUSTAN FOREST CO. [REFERRED TO]
Braj Dulal Mandal VS. State of Jharkhand [REFERRED TO]
OM PRAKASH SHARMA VS. RAJENDRA PRASAD SHEWDA AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
ADIVEPPA & ORS. VS. BHIMAPPA & ANR. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. Prashant Pallav assisted by Ms. Monalisa Singh, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. Shankar Lal Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1.

(2.) The appellants have preferred this First Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31. 05. 2008 and 05. 06. 2008 respectively passed by the learned Subordinate Judge No. I, Deoghar in Title (Partition) Suit No. 109 of 2006.

(3.) The appellants/plaintiffs have instituted Title (Partition) Suit No. 109 of 2006 for a decree of partition to the extent of 1/2 share in favour of the appellants/plaintiffs in property described in Schedule-I and IIA of the plaint and also for a decree of partition in favour of appellant no. 2/plaintiff no. 2 to the extent of 1/2 share in the property described in Schedule-1A and 2 of the plaint. It has been further prayed for granting permanent injunction against the respondents/defendants restraining them to collect the rent in respect of various shops situated at property described in Schedule-I of the plaint. The appellants/plaintiffs have also prayed for the cost of the suit and any other relief or reliefs to which they would be deemed entitled.

Click here to view full judgment.

SUSHILA DEVI Vs. DINESH PRASAD GUPTA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address