KASIM UDDIN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that without giving an opportunity of being heard to the present petitioner, the vested right, accrued to the petitioner, approximately before a decade by way of time bound promotion, has been withdrawn unilaterally by the concerned respondent authority, vide office order dated 9th February, 2005, as communicated to the petitioner vide Memo No. 170 dated 9th February, 2005 (Annexure 5 to the memo of petition).

(2.) HAVING heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the fact and circumstances of the case, the impugned order passed by the concerned respondent authority dated 9th February, 2005, at Annexure 5 to the memo of present petition, is hereby quashed and set aside, mainly for the following facts and reasons:

(3.) IN view of the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is, accordingly, allowed, to the aforesaid extent.