SIDHNATH RAM Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NO case for contempt is made out as' it is stated by the respondent -contemnor that the retiral dues have already been paid. It was further stated that, in fact, more than a sum of Rs. 2.00 lacs is fit to be recovered from the petitioner and hence no further amount is required to be paid to him.

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner vehemently opposed the same and submitted that the entire retiral dues have not been paid and he is not liable to make any payment towards the recovery of the amount.

(3.) UNDER the circumstance, the contempt petition is dismissed.