(1.) : Both the appeals are being disposed of by this common order.
(2.) SPITE of the order of status quo. In this way he submitted that the said defendants have got no respect to the law and the orders passed by this Court. Mr. Manjul Prasad, learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of said defendants/respondents, submitted that the petition for injunction was filed in the year 2001 but the same was moved only in the year 2008. He further submitted that in the impugned order, the sale of lands during pendency of the suit has been noted and it is observed that the same will be guided by the principle of lis pendence. He further submitted that the said defendants had no knowledge about the order dated 19.11.2008 when they sold lands on 20.11.2008. He submitted that the said Police report has not been brought on record by affidavit and therefore he is not in a position to deny and dispute the said allegation. However, on instruction, he submitted that the said defendants were not making construction; rather the purchasers were making construction.