(1.) THE present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:
(2.) A detailed argument has been made with regard to the applicability of Section 58(10) of the State Universities Act, as to whether it will apply retrospectively or prospectively.
(3.) HOWEVER , the counsel for the respondent refuted it and submits that a Division Bench of this Court in 2003 (4) JLJR 531 has held it otherwise while relying upon a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in : [1996]3SCR408 , that Section 58(10) of the Act as promulgated by Act 70 of 1993 will apply retrospectively.