GAUTAM SHARMA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present writ petition has been preferred mainly for getting appointment on the post of Police Constable on the ground that the petitioner has been selected and has submitted although original certificates alongwith photographs at the time of verification, but, he has never been posted on the post of Police Constable. It is also submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has cleared written as well as physical tests required for the post of Constable.

(2.) I have heard counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. who has submitted that counter affidavit has already been filed by respondent no. 4. Petitioner has changed the photograph of the original candidate and therefore, as narrated in paragraph -6 of the counter affidavit, a fraud has been played during the selection process. The signature of the Deputy Superintendent of Police was also found missing. Thus, somebody else has appeared in the qualifying written as well as physical tests in place of the petitioner. The seal of the Superintendent of Police, Chaibasa on the photograph is found missing. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled for the appointment on the post of Constable.