KAILASH BIHARI YADAV Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON repeated calls nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that on the last occasion also i.e. on 17.7.2008 when the matter was taken up in the admission matter no one appeared for the petitioners, hence, this writ petition was dismissed for non -prosecution. Thereafter, it was restored. Today also when the case was called out nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.

(2.) SINCE the counter affidavit has already been filed in this case by the respondents and, therefore, this writ application is being disposed of at this stage itself after hearing the learned counsel for the State and on the basis of the averments made in the writ petition as well as in the counter affidavit.

(3.) CONTROVERTING the claim of the petitioners, counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein it is stated that though the petitioners were initially appointed as Tube -Well Operator by the Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Bhagalpur, but as per norms and procedure of the Government a Committee was constituted for examining the case of regularization of those persons, who were working under Minor Irrigation Department, in the muster roll and on work charge basis. Accordingly, the petitioners, who were working as work charge basis, were regularized. It is further stated that in the Minor Irrigation Circle, Dumka, there was no post of Tube -Well Operators available and, therefore, the petitioners were absorbed against the posts of pump operators. It is further stated that the petitioners have never objected against their absorption on the post of pump operator and they accepted the decision of the Committee and they joined their posts. As a matter of fact they never approached any concerned authority making any grievance regarding their absorption as pump operators.