KAULESHWAR MAHTO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the appellants. In that view of the matter, on the request of the court, Shri Tapas Roy assisted the court as 'Amicus Curie' on behalf of the appellants.

(2.) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 17.01.2002 and order of sentence dated 19.01.2002 passed by Shri Ravindra Prasad Ravi, 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 444 of 1995, by which judgment, he found both the accused guilty for the offence under Sections 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He convicted the appellants and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years.

(3.) ON the basis of the said fardbeyan, police registered a case under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and after investigation police submitted a charge sheet against the accused persons under the aforesaid sections.