LAWS(JHAR)-2009-5-69

YOGENDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On May 20, 2009
YOGENDRA KUMAR Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present petition has been preferred mainly for the reasons that the services of the present petition have been terminated with effect from April 1, 2004, for the reasons that the appointment letter, upon which the petitioner is relying upon, was never issued by the respondents, the signature of the appointing authority is in dispute, the letter number is also in dispute and upon an enquiry, it has been found out that never such appointment letter has been issued to the petitioner for the post of Amin and, therefore, the services of the present petitioner have been brought to an end, vide order dated April 1, 2004, passed by respondent no. 3, at Annexure 11 to the memo of present petition.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no illegality in the appointment of the present petitioner. The petitioner was working since long. Initially also the petitioner was retrenched on March 27, 1979 and thereafter, again the petitioner was re -appointed to the post of Amin on April 1, 1989 and since 1989 the petitioner was working very smoothly with the respondents and never any objection has been raised by the respondents. The conclusion, arrived at by respondent no.3, vide order dated April 1, 2004, at Annexure 11 to the memo of present petition, are dehors the facts and, therefore, the impugned order deserves to be quashed and set aside. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the inquiry, which has been conducted by the respondents, has never been made known to the present petitioner and, therefore, also the impugned order deserves to be quashed and set aside.

(3.) HAVING heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition, mainly for the following facts and reasons: