KAILASH CHANDRA MAHTO Vs. RAM PRASAD MAHTHA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed by trial Court dated 25th of September, 2008 in Title Suit No. 22 of 2003, whereby an application preferred by the present petitioners (original substituted defendants) under Order 26 Rule 10 (A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, for appointment of the Court Commissioner, was dismissed.

(2.) HAVING heard the learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition and the same deserves to be dismissed for the following facts and reasons:

(3.) I hereby direct the trial Court to hear and decide the Title Suit No. 22 of 2003, as expeditiously as possible preferably on or before 30th of August, 2009.