ARUN CHOUDHURY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

(2.) IN spite of the service of notice, nobody has appeared for the respondent.

(3.) THE facts in short are that the management of B.C.C.L had a residential colony called Amtal Colony in which the employees of the rope -way division used to reside and for the supply of drinking wager to the residents of the said colony, the service of the concerned workmen were taken on payment of 50 paise per 'bhar'. The payment was to be made by the management.