ANIRBAN GHOSE Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioners have challenged the order dated 18.12.2002 contained in Annexure -5 to this writ petition passed by the Sub -Divisional Officer, Gumla, (Respondent no.2) in Case No. 1 of 2000, whereby in purported exercise of power section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1953, the Sub -Divisional Officer, Gumla, held that the applicant Anand Kishore Panda (Respondent no.3 herein) is still the employee of Professional Assistance for Development Action (herein after called as "PRADAN" for the sake of convenience) and thereby he is entitled to get the subsistence allowance and salary as per Rules.

(3.) FROM perusal of the application filed by the respondent no.3 it appears that the prayer was made by the respondent no.3 that the O.P. i.e. the Employer be directed to pay the amount due to him.