DHIRENDRA BIHARI SRIVASTAVA Vs. LEELA MISHRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BEING aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied by an order, passed by the Sub Judge -VI, Ranchi, in Title Suit No. 100 of 2002, dated February 24, 2009, which is at Annexure 7 to the memo of present petition, whereby, a registered document, presented by the original defendant, was permitted to be taken on record and was given exhibit number, as the same was registered sale deed pertaining to part of the suit property, purchased by the original defendant from the predecessor -in -title, the present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

(2.) HAVING heard learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition, mainly for the following facts and reasons: