RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) THE petitioner in this review petition, prayed for reviewing the order dated 22.9.2004 passed in W.P.(S) No. 4884 of 2004.

(3.) HAVING gone through the order dated 22.09.2004, and after hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any substance to make any modification in the order. The order has not decided any issue on merits, as raised by the petitioner Sunita Devi. Rather, the order has given a direction to certain responsible officers to conduct inquiry regarding the relationship of Sunita Devi with late Kedar Nath Sharma and to submit report. It appears from the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the Deputy Commissioner, Chatra had submitted a report and pursuant to the findings contained in the report, and on the basis of the instruction received, the office of the Accountant General had released substantial payment out of the retiral benefits which was payable in the account of late Kedar Nath Sharma, to the writ petitioner Sunita Devi. According to the learned counsel, the lady has usurped the entire property of the petitioner's father to which the lady was not at all entitled and even otherwise, she could not have deprived the petitioner of his share in his father's property.