RAMESH KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS appears to be the fourth attempt on the part of the petitioners for seeking directions from this Court to the concerned authorities of the Respondents to take steps for their appointment against the existing vacancies.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners while referring to the order passed by this Court in the earlier writ application vide C.W.J.C. No. 4036 of 1993 (R), submits that a direction was issued to the 10/5/2014 Page 64 Balaji fuels private limited Versus State of jharkhand Deputy Commissioner, Gumla to consider the case of the petitioners in terms of the earlier order dated -27.04.1993, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 807 of 1993 (R) as early as possible, in respect to the petitioner's grievances. Yet, according to the learned counsel, the Respondents have not filled up the vacancies by appointing the petitioners. The further grievance of the petitioners is that in the matter of appointment, they have been discriminated in as much as, though 14 persons similarly situated, were absorbed against the existing vacancies but the remaining vacancies have not been filled up by absorbing the petitioners.