PRAFULLA PANDEY Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present petition has been preferred mainly for getting pay -scale of the post of Administrative Officer, which is promotional post, as per the allegation levelled by the present petitioner.

(2.) IT is vehemently submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was initially appointed as Circle Assistant thereafter, he was appointed on the post of Administrative Officer dated 17th January, 1986 (Annexure -1 to the memo of the present petition) thereafter, he was working, since then on the said post Respondents are not paying the pay -scale of the post of Administrative Officer which is 1000 -1820 and therefore, the present petition is instituted. Counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the decision taken by the committee dated 23rd of March, 1988, which is Annexure -14 to the memo of the petition whereby as per the paragraph -5 thereof it is submitted that the petitioner is confirmed on the post of Administrative Officer and therefore, the respondent has to pay, a pay -scale of the promotional post of Administrative Officer. Counsel for the petitioner has also taken this Court to Annexure -17 of the memo of the present petition and submitted that initially petitioner had filed a petition bearing C. W. J. C. No. 5983 of 2000 before the Patna High Court and ultimately the petition was disposed of with liberty to raise the claim before this Court and, therefore, present petition has been instituted.

(3.) HAVING heard the counsel for the both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition, mainly, for the following facts and reasons: