AMIT RAJ VARDHAN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARED the parties.

(2.) BY the impugned order dated 17/06/2008, the trial court has rejected the petition under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the prosecution for examination of two charge sheeted eye-witnesses namely, Shweta Verma and Rohit Yashvardhan mainly on three grounds:-

(3.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, since Shweta Verma and her younger brother Rohit Yashvardhan, both charge sheeted eyewitnesses were getting serious threats at the hands of the accused persons and, therefore, the P.P. Incharge wrote to D.G.P., Bihar to provide adequate security to them so that they can give their evidence at Ranchi. The petitioner alleges that since adequate security was not provided to the witnesses and, therefore, they were not able to come to Ranchi to depose.