SHYAM SUNDAR NARENAI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED counsel for the complainant submits that earlier the lawyer of the opposite party was Mr. Baner - jee and he has got no instruction but argued the appeal.

(2.) IT is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the learned trial Court committed an error of law in coming to a finding that the accused -respondent who was working as an Administrative Officer in the Company of complainant, has given all the files to the concerned lawyer. Since, two files were still missing admittedly as per the evidence of P.W. 4 and as such the accused -respondent was responsible for keeping the files with him, causing loss to the Company and as such he has committed an offence.

(3.) IN course of trial the prosecution has examined 4 witnesses. P.W. 1, is Achaibat Nath Pandey, P.W. 2 is Kameshwar Singh, P.W. 3 is Dinesh Kumar Singh and P.W. 4 is Shyam Sundar Narera.