PAWAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that initially the writ petition was preferred against the suspension of license of the petitioner for running a fair price shop and during pendency of the writ petition, final order canceling the license of fair price shop having been passed by the Sub - Divisional Officer, Dhanbad, dated 10th November, 2008, which is at Annexure -6 to the Interlocutory Application, I.A. No. 2545 of 2009 has been preferred by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are several illegalities committed by the Sub - Divisional Officer, Dhanbad, in deciding the matter against the present petitioner.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the respondents, who has submitted that the impugned order, passed by the Sub -Divisional Officer, Dhanbad, canceling the license of the petitioner for running fair price shop is an appealable order under Clause 28 of the Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984 (in short "the Order, 1984") and the grievances, ventilated in this writ petition, can be ventilated before the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, in an appeal under the aforesaid Clause of the Order, 1984 and no sooner did the appeal prefer, the same will be decided, as early as possible and practicable, preferably within a time schedule, given by this Court.

(3.) THE writ petition and the interlocutory application (LA. No. 2545 of 2009) both stand disposed of, in view of the aforesaid observations and directions.