KUMARI NILMANI SUSHMA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) DESPITE the directions given by this Court vide order dated 11th of December, 2007 in WP(S) No. 3698 of 2007 mainly to consider the report to be given by the Deputy Commissioner, Plalamau before passing an order by the concerned respondent authorities for the post of Anganbari Sevika of the petitioner, no attention has been paid by the concerned respondent authorities upon a detailed reports submitted by the Additional District Magistrate, Law and Order, Palamau dated 21st of April, 2007 (Annexure -5 to the memo of the present petition) and without considering this report an impugned order dated 3rd March, 2008 has been passed by the respondent No. 4 (Annexure -10 to the memo of the present petition) and, therefore, one more petition in the form of present petition has been preferred by the petitioner.

(2.) HAVING heard learned counsels for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears: -

(3.) THIS writ petition is allowed, in view of the aforesaid direction.