ANIRUDH SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN the instant writ petition the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or mandamus as the case may be against the respondents who have not considered the case of the petitioner for regularization on the vacant post in the pay scale of Rs. 2550 -55 -2660 -60 -3200/while the cases of juniors to the petitioner respondent Nos. 5 and 6 have been considered and their services have been regularised making full discrimination from man to man vide Memo No. 227 dated 16.2.2002 issued by the respondent No.4 while the case of the petitioner is better footing as he has joined as Roller Khalasi vide Memo No. 2233 Patna dated 13.8.1982 and since then he is serving the respondents in different places as per direction issued by the respondents from time to time and his case has also been considered for appointment on the post of "Karya Bharit  Asthapna vide letter No. 5289 dated 24th December, 1985 and though the petitioner has been serving the department for more than 22 years continuously and still serving.

(2.) THE facts, in brief, are set out as under: -

(3.) THE respondents in their counter affidavit have not denied the aforesaid facts except stating at paragraphs -7 and 8 as under: -