MD.MASTAN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) .The present petition has been preferred for a direction on the respondents for allotment of a shop at Salini Market, situated at Jamshedpur. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has relied upon an allotment letter, Annexure -1 and other annexures to the memo of petition and submitted that despite the allotment of the shop the concerned authorities have never given possession of the shop in question at Salini Market, Jamshedpur. It is, therefore, prayed that a suitable direction be given to the respondents for allotment and for grant of possession of the shop in question.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents who has submitted that a detailed counter -affidavit has been filed on the basis of the record, stating clearly in Paragraph Nos. 12, 15 and 16 that there was no such allotment of the shop to the present petitioner. A false and fictitious claim has been advanced while ventilating imaginary allegations in the memo of petition. The petitioner was never allotted any shop in the Salini Market at Jamshedpur nor was given any possession of the shop and, therefore, petition deserves to be dismissed.

(3.) IN view of these facts, there is no substance in this writ petition and the same is hereby, dismissed.