STANLEUS MARANDI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties. 2006(4) JCR 184 (Jhr)] that the limitation would run after attainment of the majority and as the petitioner has attained the majority and has filed an application in the year 1997 itself, the petitioner deserves to be appointed on compassionate ground.

(2.) LEARNED counsel in this respect submits that as because of the reason that the relevant record was not available with the Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara on account of creation of the new district, he erred in passing the order rejecting the claim of the petitioner as contained in Annexure 6 and therefore, the letter as contained in Annexure 6 is fit to be set aside.