RENU KUMARI NO.1 Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:

(2.) THE main contention raised by the counsel for the petitioner is, as to whether in absence of any letter/circular the services of the petitioner could have been terminated.

(3.) THE counsel for the respondent submits that as many as 53 illegal appointments were made who were terminated from service. According to the learned counsel for the respondent the illegal appointment was made by Smt. Hemlata Yadav on 6.10.1994 without following the due process of appointment selection viz. without advertisement, interview, constitution of Selection Committee, roster clearance etc. and as per the Rule only the Board was made competent to make appointment, subject to availability of vacancy.