TRIBENI PANDEY Vs. BISHUN DEO (SUDAMA) PANDEY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present writ petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed by the Additional Munsiff dated 15th of September, 2008, in Title Suit No. 40 of 1999 (Annexure -5 to the memo of petition) below an application preferred by the original defendant under Order VI, Rule 17 to be read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure.

(2.) HAVING heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition mainly for the following facts and reasons: ''

(3.) ACCORDINGLY , this writ petition is hereby, disposed of, as dismissed.