NILAM PANDEY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By Court Appellant is the writ-petitioner aggrieved by the judgment dated 22nd August, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in W. P. (S) No. 1235 of 2003 wherein the learned Writ Court disposed of the writ petition with certain directions inter alia as follows:-

(2.) It appears that since after 1996, no initiative was taken by the concerned university to identify the vacant sanctioned post in the various faculties for its constituent colleges. If that be so, the respondent State and the concerned University should take prompt initiative to identify the vacant posts and to fill up the vacancy by way of regular appointment in accordance with the provisions under the University Act and the relevant statutes and complete the process within a period of six months from this date of order.

(3.) that, following the direction as contained in the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Civil Writ Petition Nos. 86961 and 982 of 1989, the respondents may consider relaxation of maximum age in respect of ad-hoc teachers whose services were continuously engaged for several years and may give preference to such teachers who have put in more than 10 years of teaching experience. "