MEERA CHOUDHARY Vs. DILIP MAHTO AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner is aggrieved of rejection of her application for impleadment in Title Suit No. 159 of 1995.

(2.) The petitioner is a purchaser of a part of the suit schedule property from one of the legal heirs of the original plaintiff.

(3.) The doctrine of lis pendence has been incorporated under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. The object behind Section 52 is to ensure that not only parties to the suit shall be bound by any decision in the suit, those who are claiming a right through a party to the suit also must be bound by any decision in the suit.