NAND KISHORE KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioners are aggrieved of rejection of their claim for appointment on Class-IH post; they have been appointed on Class-IV posts. They are seeking parity on the ground that similarly situated persons have been offered appointment on Class-III posts, whereas they who are also eligible for appointment on Class-III post have been appointed on Class-IV posts.

(2.) Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that initially claim of one Pramod Kumar for appointment on a Class-III post was rejected, but finally acceded and, therefore, the petitioners also must be treated alike and offered appointment on Class-III posts.

(3.) Briefly stated, claim of these petitioners for compassionate appointment was considered in the meeting of the District Compassionate Appointment Committee held on 27.12.2005 and a recommendation was forwarded for their appointment on Class-IV posts. Subsequently, one Nand Kishore Anand was recommended for appointment on Class-III post by the District Compassionate Appointment Committee on 208.2006. The petitioners namely, Nand Kishore Kumar and Upendra Kumar Mehta therefore came to this Court in W.P.(S) No.2323 of 2008 seeking a direction upon the respondents for their appointment on Class-III posts. This writ petition stood disposed of by order dated 10.01.2011 with a direction to the petitioners to submit their representations. Their representations have been rejected by the Deputy Commissioner by an order dated 19.02012. This is the order impugned by these two petitioners.