VIJAY BHUSHAN MISHRA Vs. AMALESH KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 2 in I: A. No. 9192 of 2017, Mr. Sumit Gadodia, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in L.P.A. No. 456 of 2017, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in L.P.A. No. 455 of 2017 which is connected with L.P.A. No. 456 of 2017, Mr. V. P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 15 and Mr. L. C. N. Sahdeo, learned G.P. IV appearing on behalf of the respondent-State of Jharkhand.

(2.) This application has been preferred by the respondent No. 2 herein (petitioner No. 2 in the writ petition) by which a prayer has been made for recall of the order dated

(3.) The writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 3322 of 2017 was filed by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (writ petitioner Nos. 12) for quashment of the order dated 16.2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner-cum-Registrar, Trade Union, Government of Jharkhand as contained in Memo No. 2/T2-10-03/17 Shra. No. 1335 dated 16.2017 by which the application submitted by the respondent Nos. 10 to 14 herein was allowed and the objection submitted by the petitioner was rejected. The learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 3322 of 2017 had quashed the order dated 16.2017 and had further given a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur to get the election of the Union conducted afresh within 8 weeks by verifying the voters' list and by calling for the intending candidates for filing their nomination papers and holding the election by secret ballot as well as to declare the result of the election according to law. The present appellants herein (respondent Nos. 1213 in the writ application) have challenged the order of the learned Single Judge in the present appeal. This Court vide order dated 11.9.2017 had granted an interim order of stay in favour of the appellants herein, the relevant portion of which reads as follows: