REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR MISHRA Appellant

V/S

STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PUNJAB LAND DEVELOPMENT AND RECLAMATION CORPN. LTD. VS. PRESIDING OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA ANOTHER SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE VS. PARAMESWARAN MATCH WORKS:GANDHIJI COTTAGE MATCH WORKS [REFERRED TO]
SUSHMA SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
A R ANTULAY VS. R S NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
A P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION HYDERABAD VS. B SARAT CHANDRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. RAMJEE PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SYNTHETICS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SUDHIR KUMAR JAISWAL [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION ANIL KUMAR VS. SADHANA CHAUDHARY:STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
AMI LAL BHAT VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
C N RUDRAMURTHY VS. K BARKATHULLA KHAN [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR K MANDAL VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAMRAO VS. ALL INDIA BACKWARD CLASS BANK EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION [REFERRED TO]
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN VS. SAJAL KUMAR ROY [REFERRED TO]
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. N SUBBARAYUDU [REFERRED TO]
SUBHASH CHANDRA VS. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD [REFERRED TO]
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISION VS. ARVIND SINGH CHAUHAN [REFERRED TO]
SIDDHARAM SATLINGAPPA MHETRE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. MAMATA MOHANTY [REFERRED TO]
M P RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. L G CHAUDHARY ENGINEERS [REFERRED TO]
SUNDEEP KUMAR BAFNA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
R.N. AGARWAL VS. R.C. BANSAL [REFERRED TO]
SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ETC. VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. [REFERRED TO]
HIMANGNI ENTERPRISES VS. KAMALJEET SINGH AHLUWALIA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioners for change of cut-off date which is prescribed in the public advertisement for the post of District Judges from the Bar. Advertisement No.1 of 2017 was issued on 13.10.2017 in the public Newspaper and the cut-off date for the age of the candidates is 31.01.2016 as per Rule 9 of the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2001 (for the sake of brevity hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules, 2001'). The minimum age was 35 years and the maximum age limit was 45 years for the general category candidates as on 31.01.2016. These petitioners are claiming change of cut-off date instead of 31.01.2016, it should be 31.01.2011 (as prayed in W.P.(S) No.6204 of 2017 as well as in W.P.(S) No.6699 of 2017), whereas in another writ petition, there is prayer that cut-off date should be instead of 31.01.2016, it should have been 31.01.2013 (as prayed in W.P.(S) No.6302 of 2017). Thus, for change of cut-off date and for accepting " accommodative approach", these writ petitions have been preferred.

(2.) Factual Matrix

(3.) The arguments canvassed by the counsels for the petitioners :

Click here to view full judgment.

KRISHNA KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address