KAILASH PRASAD Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

(2.) FOR issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction or a writ in the nature of mandamusc commanding upon the respondents mainly respondent No. 3, Director. B.I.T. Sindri to issue appointment letter in favour of the petitioner against the Class -IV post for which the petitioner has successfully competed in the written test followed by the interview and his name has been declared in the list of successful candidates for being appointed against Class IV posts keeping in view that the petitioner is rendering his service for the BIT. Sindri since 1989 till to date continuously and is being paid remuneration at Daily wages basis. - -

(3.) THE case of the petitioner is that he is working since 1989. It also appears that the appointment of the petitioner was in accordance with the Constitutional Mandate of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India by going through the process of selection and there is no dispute that he has worked since 1989.