SURYA MOHAN PRASAD Vs. VINOBA BHAVE UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is to quash the office order, as contained in Memo No. VBU/Esstt/2086/07 dated 4.7.2007, as also Memo VBU/Esstt/FS/248/06(P -II)/564/2007 dated 5.4.2007, issued by the respondents, whereby, the petitioner was made to superannuate with effect from 30.4.2007 on the ground that he has completed 42 years of service.

(2.) ACCORDING to the case of the petitioner, the aforesaid orders have been issued in violation of Section 67 of the Jharkhand State Universities Act, 2000, which prescribes 60 years as the age of retirement for non -teaching employees of the University/According to the petitioner, his date of birth is 1.1.1949, which has been entered in his service book and as per the said date of birth, he would retire from service on 31st December, 2008, after completing 60 years of age.

(3.) A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University, wherein, it is stated that the petitioner was initially appointed by the Ranchi University in the year, 1965 as peon and thereafter he became Routine Clerk in the year, 1975 and after creation of Binoba Bhave University in the year, 1992, his services were transferred to the said Vinoba Bhave University on 7.4.1997 but the service records of the petitioner were not sent to the Vinoba Bhave University by the Ranchi University and, therefore, his service records could not be verified and, accordingly, the petitioner was directed to produce matriculation certificate but the same has not been produced by him and, therefore, the University had no option but to confirm the order of his retirement.