MOHAN KUMAR PANDEY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner has preferred this writ application for quashing the order dated 22.05.2007, issued by the respondent No. 4 the Superintendent of the Police, Giridih (Annexure -6), whereby the appointment of the petitioner to the post of constable, was cancelled.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having been appointed as 'Home Guard' on 02.03.1989 in the erstwhile. State of Bihar, received training at Central Training Institute, Bihata, Patna.

(3.) THEREAFTER , he was served with a copy of the order, as contained in Memo No. 1778 dated 22.05.2007 (Annexure -6), issued by the Superintendent of Police, Giridih, informing therein that his services have been terminated on the ground that he had secured appointment in the quota of Home Guard on the basis of Home Guard Training Certificate, but that certificate relates to training of Home Guard in the State of Bihar not to the State of Jharkhand.