HARI NARAYAN MISHRA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties. The petitioners, who retired from service on 31.1.1999 as Store Keeper from the office of Executive Engineer, irrigation Mechanical Division, Deo -ghar, has filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondents to make payment of the entire retiral benefits, including G.P.F. amount for the period from 1963 to 1995 and difference of salary for the period from 1.1.1996. His further prayer is to re -fix the final pension after giving him the benefit on revision of pay with effect from 1.1.1996.

(2.) BY filing counter -affidavit on behalf of the State, it has been stated that the petitioner had earlier moved this Court in W.P. (S) No. 1733 of 2003 and the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat. Before the Lok Adalat, held on 1.8.2004, the petitioner was given a cheque amounting to Rs. 1,46,861/ - towards the amount of Group Insurance, final G.P.F. for the period from 1.9.1995 to 31.1.1999, leave salary and duty pay for the period from 1.9.1995 to 30.4.1996, leave salary and duty pay for the period from 1.5.1998 to 30.6.1998 and 1.11.1998 to 31.12.1998, arrears of increments for the period from 1.12.1991 to 31.3.1997, arrears of central pay fixation and house rent for the period from 1.4.1997 to 31.1.1999 amounting to Rs. 1,47,155/ - after deducting bank commission of Rs. 294/ -. It has further been stated in the counter -affidavit that a sum of Rs. 2,23,070/ - was deposited in the bank account of the petitioner with the State Bank of India, Deoghar, towards 90% provisional pension for the period from February, 1999 to June, 2003 and 90% gratuity and in this manner, the petitioner has been paid Rs. 3,82,931/ - before the Lok Adalat towards the retiral dues. It has specifically been stated in the counter -affidavit that so far as G.P.F. amount is concerned, the entire amount was paid to the petitioner.

(3.) IT is also stated in the counter -affidavit that since the petitioner retired from service on 31.1.1999 and, therefore, the benefit of revised pay scale with effect from 8.8.2002 cannot be given to him.