BASANT KUMAR Vs. BRINDAVAN BAIDYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.5.2007 passed by Sub -Judge -I, Palamau at Daltonganj allowing the intervention petition dated 26.3.2007 filed under Order I, Rule 10(2) by respondent nos. 1 to 3 herein.

(2.) MR . Manjul Prasad, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that this writ petition should not have been allowed, as the father of the interveners was party in the suit and the said petition was filed at the stage of defendant's evidence.

(3.) AFTER hearing the parties, the learned court below was satisfied that the interveners should be added as party. It observed that their claim will be decided on merits according to law. The learned court below had jurisdiction to pass the impugned order. I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.