GEETANJALI KUMARI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed as primary teacher by issue of an appointment letter dated 30th April, 1988 as contained in Annexure -2. The appointment letter contains several conditions particularly clause -4, wherein it is mentioned that the appointment was being made on the basis of the certificates submitted by the applicants and if after enquiry/verification any of the educational certificate is found to be not genuine, in that case the services would be terminated and appropriate action would be taken against the applicants.

(3.) BY issue of Annexure -5 dated 30th August, 1988, a report was sent by the Principal of the said Institutions, i.e. St. Mary's Women's Primary Teacher's Training College, Deoghar, to the District Superintendent of Education, Dumka after verification of the teachers intimating that out of 38 candidates, the certificate of two candidates namely Geetanjali Kumari, i.e. the petitioner and of one Pushpa Kumari were found to be fake and forged.