(1.) Heard the parties.
(2.) IN this writ petition, the petitioner had originally challenged the order dated 25.2.2008 passed by the Sub -Judge, Vth, Dhanbad in Title (Eviction) Suit No. 64 of 1999, allowing the petition filed on behalf of the plaintiff -respondent to close the evidence of the plaintiff.
(3.) THIS is a suit for eviction of the year 1999. The learned Court below has rightly found that the defendant -petitioner is simply trying to delay the disposal of the suit on one pretext or the other. I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 25.2.2008 especially in view of the conduct of the defendant -peitioner.