LAL DUTTA THAKUR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Counsel appearing for the State of Jharkhand and learned Counsel appearing for the State of Bihar.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner was working as Personal Assistant to one of the Minister in the State of Bihar, was allotted with quarter, bearing quarter No. C -23, Road No. 11. Gardanibagh, Patna. Subsequently, on bifurcation of the State, the petitioner was allotted Jharkhand cadre and by virtue of that, he joined here on 25.4.2005 as Personal Assistant to the Minister, Department of Forest and Environment and presently the petitioner is working as Personal Assistant to the Minister, Department of Rural Development and when the petitioner joined here, he claimed house rent allowance under the provision as contained in Rule 5(7) of the Bihar State Employees (House Rent Allowance) Rules, 1980 as the petitioner had not been allotted any quarter in the State of Jharkhand, whereas the petitioner had retained the quarter at Bihar to which, he was paying rent and now penal rent has been fixed which would be paid by the petitioner as soon as the petitioner would be getting house rent allowance at Jharkhand. - -

(3.) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the State of Bihar submits that the quarter which was allotted to the petitioner when he was posted in Bihar has still been retained though in the year 2005 itself the petitioner had been allotted State of Jharkhand and not only that the penal rent fixed is also being not paid by the petitioner.